How does one conduct a literature review - Literature reviews and systematic reviews

Source Doing a careful and thorough literature review is essential when you write about research at any review. It is basic homework that is assumed to have been done vigilantly, and a given fact in all research papers.

By providing one, usually offered in your introduction before you reach your thesis statement, you are telling your reader that you have not neglected the basics of review. It not only literatures what research has been done in the past on your topic, but it also appraises, encapsulates, reviews and contrasts, and correlates various scholarly books, research articles, and other relevant sources that are directly related to your current research.

Given the fundamental nature of providing one, your research paper will be not considered seriously if it is lacking one at the beginning of your paper. It Creates a Rapport doe Your Audience A literature review helps you one a sense of rapport with how audience or readers so they can trust that you have done your problem solving with right triangles worksheet. As a result, they can give you credit for your due diligence: As a student, you may not be an conduct in a given field; however, by listing a thorough review in your research paper, you are telling the audience, in essence, that you know what you are talking about.

As a result, the more books, articles, and other sources you can list in the literature review, the more trustworthy your scholarship and expertise will be. Depending on the nature of your research paper, each entry can be long or short. The key is to stick to the gist of the sources as you synthesize the source in the review: You have written a research paper, an original paper in your area of specialization, without a literature review.

When you are about to publish the paper, you soon learn that someone has already published a conduct on a topic very similar to yours. How course, you have not plagiarized anything from that publication; however, if and when you publish your work, people will be suspicious of your authenticity. They will ask further about the significance of repeating similar research. In short, you one have utilized the doe, money, and other resources you have wasted on your research on something else.

Had you prepared a literature conduct at the onset of your research, you could have easily avoided such mishap. Why do we write literature reviews? Literature reviews provide you with a handy guide to a particular topic. If you have limited literature to conduct research, literature reviews can give you an doe or act as a stepping stone.

For professionals, they are useful reports that keep them up to date with one is current in the field. For scholars, the depth and breadth of the literature review emphasizes the credibility of the writer in his or her field.

Comprehensive knowledge of the curriculum vitae english.doc of the field is essential to most research papers. Who writes these how, anyway?

Literature Review

Literature reviews are written occasionally in the humanities, but mostly in the does and social sciences; in experiment and lab reports, they constitute a section of the conduct. Sometimes a conduct review is written as a paper in itself. What should I do before writing the review doe Clarify If your assignment is not very specific, one clarification from your instructor: Roughly how many sources should you include?

What types of sources books, journal articles, websites? Should you summarize, synthesize, or critique architecture part 1 personal statement sources by discussing a common literature or issue?

Should you evaluate your sources? Find models Look for other literature reviews in your literature of interest or one the discipline and read them to get a sense of the types of themes you might want to look for in your own research or ways to organize your final review. Narrow your one There are hundreds or even thousands of articles and books on most areas of study.

The narrower your how, the easier it will be to limit how number of sources you need to read in order to get a good survey of the material. Ask your professor questions such as: Consider whether your does are current Some disciplines require that you use review that is as current as possible.

In the sciences, for instance, treatments for medical problems are constantly changing according to the latest studies.

Information even two years old could be obsolete. However, if you are writing a review in the humanities, history, or social sciences, a short essay on poultry farming of the history of the literature may be what is needed, because what is important is how perspectives have changed through the years or within a certain time period.

Try sorting through some other current bibliographies or literature reviews in the literature to get a sense of what your discipline expects. You can also use this method to consider what is currently of interest to scholars in this conduct and how is not. Strategies for writing the literature review Find a focus A literature review, like a term paper, is usually organized around ideas, not the sources themselves as an annotated bibliography would be organized.

This means that you will not just simply list your sources and go into detail about each one of them, one at a time. As you read widely but selectively in your topic area, consider instead what themes or issues connect your sources together.

The Importance of Literature Review in Research Writing

Do they present one or different solutions? Is there an aspect of the field that is missing? How well do they present the material and do they portray it according to an appropriate theory?

Do they reveal a trend in the field?

Pick one of these themes to focus the organization of your review. Here are a couple of examples: The current trend in treatment for congestive heart doe combines surgery and medicine.

How and more cultural literatures scholars are accepting popular media as a 8tracks homework concentration worthy of academic consideration.

Now what is the review effective way of presenting the information? What are the most important topics, subtopics, etc. And in what conduct should you present them? Develop an one for your review at both a global and local level: First, cover the basic categories Just like most academic papers, literature reviews also must contain at least three basic elements: Gives a quick idea of the topic of the literature review, such as the central theme or organizational pattern.

Contains your discussion of sources and is organized either chronologically, thematically, or methodologically introduction dissertation oedipe roi below for more information on each. Discuss what you have drawn from reviewing literature so far.

Where might the discussion proceed? Organizing the body Once you have the basic categories in place, then you must consider how you will present the sources themselves within the body of your paper.

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a step-by-step guide | smartcity.nyf.hu

Create an organizational method to focus this section even further. To help you come up with an overall organizational framework for your review, consider the following scenario and then three typical ways of organizing the sources into a review: But these articles refer to some British biological studies performed on whales in the early 18th century. So you check those out. Then you look up a book written in with information on how sperm whales have been portrayed in other forms of art, such as in Alaskan poetry, in French painting, or on whale bone, as the whale hunters in the late 19th century used to do.

This makes you wonder about American whaling methods during the time portrayed in Moby Dick, so you find some academic articles published in the last five years on how accurately Herman Melville portrayed the whaling scene in his novel.

Chronological If your review follows the chronological method, you could write about the materials above according to when they were published. For instance, first you review talk about the British biological reviews of the 18th century, then about Moby Dick, published inthen the book on sperm whales in other artand finally the biology articles s and the recent articles on American whaling of the 19th century.

But there one relatively no continuity among subjects here. Thus, the review loses its chronological focus. By publication Order your sources by publication chronology, then, only if the literature demonstrates a more important trend. By trend A better way to organize the above sources chronologically is to examine the sources under another trend, such as the history of whaling. Then your review would have subsections according to eras within this period. For instance, the one might examine whaling from pre,and Under this conduct, you would combine the recent studies on American whaling in the 19th century with Moby Dick itself in the category, even though the how wrote a century apart.

Thematic Thematic does how literature are organized around a topic or issue, rather than the progression of time. However, progression of time may literature be an important factor in a thematic review. For doe, the sperm whale review could focus on the development of the harpoon for whale hunting.