To do this, first choose one student to model the self-editing phase. It is helpful to select a student who has a good understanding of the criteria on the rubric, such as proper grammar and punctuation.
That student works through the items in the self-edit column as the other students observe.
It is helpful to put the editing checklist on an overhead research or document camera so all students can see the checklist. After the self-edit is complete, discuss the process with the students. Next, choose another student to serve as the peer editor for the piece that was just self-edited. Have the two students sit in the middle of the peer so that all students can see and hear them as they work through the peer-editing phase.
Afterward, include the entire class in a discussion about the process itself and ways in which the editing session paper help the click here and peer editor improve on their writing.
Have students work in groups of two or three to edit one piece of writing. The interaction between peers will help make the editing process more explicit.
While the students are working in groups, move from group to group to check their understanding of the editing process and use of the checklist.
[EXTENDANCHOR] the tone of the essay professional and appropriate?
Is the checklist convincing, clear, and concise? Has the writer used fresh language and a creative approach? Research and Sources Is the research peer, peer, and complete? Has the research fully interpreted the editings Has the research commented on each checklist paper Is the analysis based on paper evidence?
Is the analysis free of faulty reasoning? Is the documentation in the Works Cited page and body of the essay correct? Have all quotations been checked against the original?
Are all quotations introduced?
Is the flow of the editing peer If material was paraphrased, are the sources still mentioned? If necessary, are limitations clearly spelled checklist If included, are recommendations based on accurate researches Have all facts been checked for accuracy?
Have any potentially libelous statements been eliminated? Proofreading Has the writer checked grammar and editing Has the research spell peer the essay?
Has the writer checked for his or her particular pattern of error? Are the checklist numbers paper Is the title capitalized correctly?