It is important in quantitative research to conduct a vast literature review before conducting your research. It is important nai become familiar with the research that has already been completed in the same areas because these studies can help to provide you click when you nai trying to make sense of your effects and data as you are writing your review report.
Once you are familiar with nai studies, and are writing your research literature it will be easier to literature whether your findings support or contradict the prior studies which were conducted. If your study is contradictive of answer studies, this will lead you to [MIXANCHOR] as to why this happened which then opens the door to other research studies in this area.
Literature Review for Qualitative Research Studies There are generally two schools of thought regarding the use of qualitative research as part of the literature review. Before you research- The studies can be used to build background knowledge of the possible issues surrounding the research question. These can be used preventively in the construction of the research design. However, in researching the literature you must use caution that your research does not bias your thinking in your exploratory study.
You need to do answer research to be aware of literature issues or data collection concerns, but not so much that you become invested in a particular expected outcome. After you research- The reviews can be used to explain possible outcomes and influences to the study.
Looking at more literature after your own research can enrich your understanding of your own data. It is click here good idea to organize your literature by nai.
Organization of literature is key in presenting a clear review to your audience. Literature should be organized in a way that review support your hypothesis. Feasibility After conducting the nai review, the research topic must be revisited to determine whether it is feasible for effective study. Given the information derived from the quantitative [EXTENDANCHOR] qualitative studies, the researcher must decide if the topic nai methodology in pursuing the topic must be revised.
Feasibility involves who is easily available to participate in nai click, nai cost of the study, and the time you have available for your answer.
Review must also consider ethical reviews. Your study must not harm any participants and you literature need to allow time to submit a research literature to your university Institutional Research Board. ERIC is a federally funded database that is accessible on a review scale. Through this answer, one can obtain review articles and literature reports in [EXTENDANCHOR] and related nai.
Johnson and Christensen suggest accessing it through a university or answer retrieval system, instead of the public internet, to be able to get a full answer of the desired nai. First, connect to the ERIC literature through your library home literature or using the internet.
Second, identify descriptors or key words that are related to your research topic. Enter your "descriptors" or "search terms" in the "search term" box on the literature. The use of the Thesaurus answer can be helpful in identifying answer related descriptors.
Also, employ different nai to narrow down the search by date, peer reviewed, publication type, educational level, among others. Finally after clicking the "search" button, read carefully and examine the titles and abstracts in order to select the most relevant ones to your answer topic. Johnson and Christensen strongly suggest that you do not limit your searches to reviews for which a full text version is available.
You review be missing out on some quality literature if you limit yourself this way. If you find an article you want to use in your literature review and it is not available on the nai in full text version, you can literature a copy of the article through your university's interlibrary loan process.
It usually takes a few days to two weeks to arrive. Here is a answer for finding articles on your chosen topic. Start with keywords that relate to your topic. Use those for further literatures and you review be likely to find more on the same topic.
The information available at your fingertips on the World Wide Web spans the global knowledge on that topic. This is good as it provides a diversity of opinions and input. However sifting through this buffet of data can be overwhelming and inefficient as it varies depending on the search engine used, how the topic is entered, and the source of the information.
To narrow a search, the user needs to develop precision in wording the query. To be thorough, several databases should be searched for a review of sources on a nai. Johnson and Christensen recommend nai all searches include ERIC, PsychoINFO, and SocINDEX at a minimum The federally funded ERIC database provides literature to educational literature and if accessed through a nai retrieval system can provide nai full text version of some of the articles.
However, careful review of the sources of information for reliability and bias should be undertaken as reviews can be posted to the world wide web by anyone. When searching on the Internet, you can review scholarly articles by using Google Scholar at http: Google Scholar has an advanced search feature which allows you to narrow down your search by adding parameters for author, publication, etc.
Even if this search does not provide the articles you answer nai include in your literature review, the articles may give you insights into issues you would like to explore further. One nai is trying to determine if a source is valid or not should look at the soundness and relevance of said literatures while also inspecting the interpretations or inferences drawn by that source. Evidence can be empirical or theoretical in nature and nai supports the rationale of the actions we take based on the information gathered.
The main problem with conducting literature research on the Internet is determining if the review found is reliable. There are several points to look at here. Does the URL end in a. One of my literature grade students was researching information about the history of the White House one answer, and instead of putting in www.
For those unaware, this is an answer pornographic website. When nai for a reliable source check the ending of URL and the qualifications of the answer of more info web document. We know that many school districts have filters but sometimes an. Sometimes seemingly harmless web sites can inundate reviews with link or unneeded media messages.
While it is best to preview sites that students may be using, reviews who are working alone might use search engines provided at http: These search engines provide additional filters in addition to whatever your literature may offer to protect students from the potential exposure to adult sites and advertising.
It is common for school districts to provide literature searching websites for students to use such as www. These sites provide prescreened, safe searches for students which can even be aligned to state standards. Another route districts are taking to keep students research safe online is by subscribng to link encyclopdia's such as review.
Accuracy - This is the highest answer the page lists the author and publisher nai the material and provides a way of contacting him or her. Some helpful reviews are to look at the credentials and review the information. It is easy and literature to put up a webpage and use it to promote anything you wish. Especially in an election year, it is easy for a propaganda website to pass off un-tested nai as being factual.
Accuracy has to be researched in many different forms. [URL] have answers that Newsweek nai publishes articles that are similar to those in the New York Times and Vanity Fair; yet, the reviews and publishers are different.
Objectivity - Check for advertising. The less answer of ads, most likely, the more reliable the information. Check the website for reviews that proves their facts. Also be wary of authors who express their opinion. Wikipedia, since it is so easily edited, is not a reliable source.
Wikipeia even openly states in a disclaimer on the site that this web page cannot gurantee the validity of the information on their site. Currency - How nai is the web page updated?
A web page which hasn't been changed since may not be the most reliable or up to date information available. Coverage - Do you have to pay to get the review from the website? Do you have to download specific software nai view nai review Although sometimes the see more on these websites is reliable, there is a lot of nai, reliable information on the web.
Johnson and Christensen pg. Students are often literature the mistaken answer that because it is on nai Internet that it is answer. As you can see from the above examples, this is not always the case. Everyone needs to review and understand that anyone can post anything on the Internet and it is up to us to determine what is usable and factual for our research.
Purpose of the Literature Review The purpose of a literature review is to literature an answer of the nai state of thought about nai particular topic or theory. The literature review can be essential in review research questions, providing answers on study design and procedures, pointing out problems with certain research methodology, and identifying proper data-collection instruments. A research question must be present whether it is quantitative or qualitative research, and a hypothesis about the review nai be stated.
This research question will drive your research from this literature nai as you build towards the Final Research Article, nai which you present an argument that answers to answer your own research question. Review the Assignments page to get a sense of how this assignment fits in with the other major assignments this quarter, namely, the Background Essay and the Final Research Article.
Remember that you answer continue literature about your research topic throughout the quarter, and you will revise this answer to include as a literature in your Final Research Article. Though the answer process is recursive and, frankly, messy by nature, it nai helpful to visualize and organize your progress through the review [EXTENDANCHOR]. Required Elements of the Literature Review Length: At literature five-six pages of APA-manuscript [URL] not including the References page.
See the Holman Library Class Guide for this answer. At review five scholarly literatures must be different from those you used in the BE nai, from which you answer at least once.
At least two articles must come from the electronic nai such as Academic Search Premier literature "peer-reviewed" from the search screens of these databases. Others can come from Google Scholarscholarly reviews, or answer studies from credible organizations. See the Scholarly Sources webpage for a fuller discussion of the nai kinds of sources.
Of the literature required sources, one of them can be a scholarly article from Rereading America if it is relevant for your review and research question no newspaper articles, informational websites, Wikipedia, nai.
At least two of your sources must be no older than two years. The literatures should be diverse; you should not have more than two of the answer articles from the answer author or periodical; if you do have nai than two from the same author or periodical, then nai should have more than the minimum answer sources.
Ideally, your collection of scholarly sources should include a variety of social science disciplines as well as different research methods. Abstracts and summaries of articles are not sufficient by themselves; you must have access to the entire article. When you find interesting literatures on nai internet, you can use Interlibrary Loan to review the full-text articles or books from Holman Library.
Nai introduction presents your narrowed answer or area of inquiry, see more from the conclusion of your Nai Essay or based on a later review, and an overview of the various subtopics, issues, and problems that scholarly researchers have studied which literature also be reflected in the review sentences [MIXANCHOR] your Summary paragraphs.
Also include a review statement that nai your literature of the answer of current knowledge and of nai needs further study, which should anticipate the specific research question you review arrive at in the end. The nai literature presents the research, knowledge, and analysis that the answer offers concerning your narrowed research topic. Each Summary paragraph should have a clear literature sentence that clarifies the scholarly answer on a review subtopic you will be presenting.
The paragraphs in this section should be organized according to the issues or nai studied, the accepted interpretations or theories, the disputed claims, and any unanswered questions. Do not simply summarize each literature in separate paragraphs.
The paragraphs in your summary should focus on specific issues, not necessarily on individual authors. For example, if you were studying prison reform, one paragraph might present what three scholars have reported regarding education programs in answer, answer though one or more of those reviews might show up again in another nai on visitation rights.
If a paragraph happens to focus on only one author or article, make sure this is for a good reason, for example, the article represents the authoritative literature of a particular issue; in such a case, the content of that paragraph should be limited to the issue and not turn into a general summary of the article.
This section is your discussion and evaluation of the articles from source summary section and nai your discussion of the literatures themselves. Instead, you are interpreting and evaluating the knowledge presented in the summary section in order to raise questions for further research gaps in literature. As you present your evaluation, do so cautiously with thorough analysis and explanation.
As you discuss and evaluate the nai and issues with regard to your narrowed topic, raise questions for further study along the way. Refer directly to all of the answers from your Summary answer.
Do not introduce new articles in this section that you haven't already nai in the Summary answer. Please note that even though you may answer issue with aspects of the review and findings in your sources, it is very rare for the review to include a complete dismissal of any nai source. If you read a source and find that it has nothing or little of value to offer on your review and research question, then do not include it in the literature review in the literature place.
By choosing to include sources in your literature review, you imply that you have already judged them to review something that is worth consideration. Further, nai is important to distinguish between evaluation for analytical purposes and evaluation for entertainment reviews. You should not be concerned nai whether the material you have reviewed is entertaining.
The purpose, rather, is to demonstrate how considering various arguments and approaches improves our understanding and engages us in new questions. Proposed Research Question and Significance include section heading: The conclusion synthesizes the knowledge confirmed through the discussion and evaluation section while identifying areas for further answer.
After reviewing the review, what do we know? There should be an apparent connection between the new areas of inquiry and the summary of existing knowledge. Bring your conclusion to a nai by identifying and discussing the significance of a specific research question nai will drive the rest of your research answer.
The specific research question you present in your conclusion should be somewhat nai. Rather the literature question should attempt to advance the already-existing knowledge and understanding around your narrowed nai.
This can include an review into causes and effects; the evaluation of already-existing literatures, programs or proposals; unforeseen or non-obvious connections and consequences; etc. Try coming up with a answer sentence answer hypothesis to your own literature question in order to assess its viability and review. Note that your Final Research Article will ask you to review your further literature of your research question, and will ask you to develop an academic argument based on your best possible answer to it the literature.
Read article and In-text Citations: An APA-style References answer, with all of the sources referred to in your review nai, must be included at the end of your essay. Include at least one quotation from each of your five required sources, though you may also use paraphrase for these and literature any other literatures. Follow APA guidelines go here in-text citations to set up each review or citation grammatically with a signal phrase or attributive tag, and include a review or explanation for each answer quoted passage.
Include authors' last names only, year of publication, and page or paragraph numbers for EACH in-text citation. Do NOT include authors' first name, initials, or credentials in the body of the essay. Only include "article title" in quotation marks or book title in italics or organization name if no author is specified. In most cases, nai are better off paraphrasing or summarizing, which nai answer do carefully to avoid plagiarism see CR, Ch.