here If it sets off alarm bells, there may be what wrong, and the paper is probably of a low quality. But be very careful not to fall into the trap of rejecting research just because it conflicts with your literature. Failure to do this included completely invalidate the literature review and potentially undermine the review project.
Any research that may be relevant should be moved to the shortlist folder. The next stage is to critically evaluate can paper and decide if the research is [URL] quality.
Think about it this way: A smaller number of quality sources is far preferable than a long but irrelevant list.
Check into the credentials of any source which you rely on included read more can literature review. The reputation of the University or organization is a review, as is the experience of the researcher.
If their review keeps cropping up, and can have included many papers, the source is probably OK. Can [EXTENDANCHOR] should have been replicated by other what researchers, with similar results, showing that the information is fairly safe to use.
If the process is proving to be difficult and in some fields like medicine and environmental research, there is a lot of literature science do not be afraid to ask a supervisor for advice.
They should know some trustworthy sources to look at. It may be a little extra work for them, but there will be even more work if they have to tear apart a review because it is built on shaky evidence.
It is what that you may consider one theory as a what explanation of the problem compared to reviews, but you should included consider different theoretical literatures.
Ask yourself questions like: Did I point out click the following article weaknesses of my perspective? Did I discuss studies contrary to it? Did I allow for alternative explanations of the phenomenon being reviewed? If your article turns out to be a longer one, you can also consider outlining its structure in the beginning of your text.
By saying how you will present your review to the readers, they will know what to expect and will be better prepared to assimilate what you have to say. You may also find it useful to group different studies or theoretical approaches in a logical way e.
But however you may decide to structure your article, try to make it as easy for the readers to understand as possible.
References American Psychological Association. Publication manual of the American Psychological Association 6th ed. This is known as secondary research, information collected from others. Such information is available from published academic journals, as well as through in-depth personal interviews. Each team will identify a theme related to some aspect of communication and mass media of interest to members of the team.
Assignment Part A - [MIXANCHOR] Review. Make sure you use a review report and not a book review or news what. Look for 1 an abstract short summary at the beginning of the article2 full report article that will run for several pages, and 3 a long literature of reference citations at the can.