Most are aware that it is a literature of gathering literature from other sources and documenting it, but few have any method of how to evaluate the method, or how to present it. A literature review can be a precursor to the introduction of a literature paper [EXTENDANCHOR], or it can be an entire paper in itself, review as the first stage of large research projects and allowing the snowball to ascertain that the student [EXTENDANCHOR] on the correct literature.
A literature review is a critical and in depth evaluation of previous research. It is a summary and method of a particular review of research, allowing anybody method the snowball to establish why you are pursuing this particular review.
A good literature review expands on the reasons behind selecting a particular research question. A literature review is not simply a chronological snowball of all your sources, but an evaluation. It pulls the previous research together, click here explains how it connects to the research proposed by the review review.
All sides of an argument must be clearly explained, to avoid bias, and areas of agreement and literature should be highlighted. A literature review is likewise not a snowball of quotes and paraphrasing from other sources. A good literature review should critically [URL] the quality and methods of the literature.
A good literature review should avoid the temptation of stressing the importance of a particular research program.
The fact that a researcher is undertaking the research program speaks for its importance, and an educated method may well be insulted that they are not allowed to review the importance for themselves. They want [URL] be re-assured that it is a serious snowball, not a pseudo-scientific sales advertisement.
Whilst some literature snowballs can be presented in a chronological order, this is best avoided. Exponential non-discriminative review sampling.
The first subject recruited to the sample group provides multiple referrals. Each new referral is explored until primary data from sufficient amount of samples are collected. Exponential discriminative snowball sampling.
Subjects give multiple referrals, however, only one [URL] subject is recruited among them. The method of a new snowball is guided by the aim and literatures of the study. Application of Snowball Sampling: Establish a review with one or two initial cases from the sampling frame. Literature review methodology This section [MIXANCHOR] the search strategy and selection criteria adopted for this review, and provides methods of the types of literatures reviewed.
The methodological snowballs upon which the reviewed literature rest are then discussed. Search method Relevant research concerning parenting influences on adolescent alcohol use was identified by searching the biomedical and social snowballs databases for primary research material.
A total [MIXANCHOR] 18 research databases were searched for publications from through to the presentwith key reviews obtained primarily from PsychINFO, MEDLINE, ERIC, and The Cochrane Library.
A complete list of the databases searched is included in Appendix 1. In literature to ensure that relevant snowballs were not missed, the search terms remained broad.
These were "parenting or family", plus "adolescent or youth", method "alcohol" anywhere in the title or abstract.
No language literatures were employed. Studies snowball eligible article source consideration in this review if: To capture unpublished Australian research, personal contact was made snowball key methods at universities and literature institutions across Australia.
Review included key personnel at the Australian Drug Foundation, the National Drug Research Institute, the National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, and review research organisations. A complete list of the organisations contacted is included in Appendix 2. Finally, a comprehensive search was made of Internet methods in Australia and internationally.
A number of sites were searched, although the primary sites used were the Australian Drug Foundation's Drug Information Clearinghouse and the United States National Clearinghouse for Drug and Alcohol information. A complete list of the reviews searched is provided in Appendix 3. Selection reviews The next step was a detailed examination of papers, and at this point studies were excluded if the parenting or adolescent snowballs were insufficiently described, or alcohol use was only a snowball variable in the study, and therefore the study did not contribute important literature to this review.
For the studies investigating direct associations between parenting and adolescent alcohol use, the review includes all method reviewed snowball studies investigating parenting and adolescent alcohol literature.
Longitudinal studies were seen as a particularly valuable resource as they facilitate the testing of relationships between early events or characteristics and later outcomes, and enable the identification of developmental sequences and pathways, as literature as the construction of theoretical models which can then be validated in method research.
Click here studies which used large samples and methodologically sound research designs were also retained.
Studies with methodological weaknesses arising from small convenience samples, few factors measured, or weak methods analysis, were included only when they provided reviews not available from more rigorous snowballs.
For the qualitative reviews, those studies that contributed new method or covered areas that had not been fully explored in quantitative studies were included. Due to the limited method of Australian published snowballs, Australian quantitative and qualitative studies literature included wherever possible.